Opus Bank Expands Into BrokerDealer Services

Posted on by admin

Opus BankBrokerdealer.com blog update is courtesy of a press release from Opus Bank and found on MarketWatch

Opus Bank, a California-chartered commercial bank, provides high-value, relationship-based banking products, services, and solutions to its clients through its Retail Bank, Commercial Bank, Merchant Bank, and Correspondent Bank. They recently just expanded to provide brokerdealer services through a subsidiary called Opus Financial Partners.

Opus Bank (“Opus” or the “Bank”) OPB, -0.54% announced today that it has established and received regulatory approval for Opus Financial Partners, LLC (“Opus Financial Partners” or “OFP”), the broker-dealer subsidiary of the Bank. Opus Financial Partners will further enable Opus’ Merchant Bank to help its clients address their financial and advisory needs related to raising equity capital, targeted acquisition and divestiture strategies, general mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financing, balance sheet restructuring, valuation, strategy, and performance improvement. Dale Cheney, Senior Managing Director, Head of the Merchant Bank, will also lead Opus Financial Partners.

Dale Cheney, Senior Managing Director, stated, “Opus Financial Partners’ capabilities complement Opus’ Merchant Bank by providing a comprehensive and integrated capital and advisory solution to lower middle-market companies, business owners, and private equity groups.” Cheney added, “The traditional investment banking model, with its layers of intermediaries and capital providers, is inefficient and outdated for today’s dynamic business environment where business owners and entrepreneurs are constantly challenged by limited time and resources. We partner with these executives and their companies to provide a sophisticated, one-stop capital and advisory solution that allows them to focus on building a successful business.”

Stephen H. Gordon, Opus Bank’s Founding Chairman, CEO & President, commented, “There is a void in the lower middle-market where access to debt and equity capital is limited and delivered inefficiently. Additionally, even successful companies that want to expand and grow their businesses typically don’t have access to the sophisticated M&A and other advisory services they need in order to capitalize on strategic opportunities and remain competitive. The capabilities provided through Opus’ Merchant Bank and through our broker-dealer, Opus Financial Partners, will help our clients to thoughtfully and strategically grow, capitalize or monetize their business.” Mr. Gordon concluded, “Having begun my career over 30 years ago as an investment banker, I recognize that we have an opportunity to fill a void and address a significant need by building a market-leading West Coast-based merchant bank that adheres to Opus’ entrepreneurial philosophy of partnering with our clients, as opposed to simply serving as transaction advisors.”

Startups Bypass BrokerDealers and Investment Bankers

Posted on by admin

154012464-304BrokerDealer.com blog update courtesy of extract from Jan 2 WSJ story by Telis Demos

Wall Street is dealing with new challenges in one of its bedrock businesses, taking young companies public, as more startups choose to stay private longer.

A number of Internet, software and consumer companies are raising huge sums in private deals that enable them to postpone initial public offerings for years, if not indefinitely. Moreover, they often negotiate these private placements directly with investors, bypassing banks.

Initial stock sales are still thriving, despite the big private companies that have held out on an IPO. This past year was the biggest for U.S.-listed IPOs since the dot-com peak in 2000.

But the trend of companies staying private could present longer-term problems for banks. If companies delay or avoid going public, it could threaten the fees and other relationships—with investors, hot young companies and wealthy executives—that banks get from working on IPOs.

Some Wall Street firms are responding by beefing up their teams that work on the private deals, which also gives the firms another chance to build links with startups that may do an IPO later. The private deals could also generate a new stream of fees before the eventual IPO windfall.

“It’s obvious why banks are ramping up for more private offerings,” said David Erickson, a former banker who is now an operating partner at venture-capital firm Bessemer Venture Partners. But because company executives “have already met a lot of public investors by that time, the pitch for bankers is likely more challenging,” he said.

For the full WSJ story, please click here.

Private Equity Firms Now Face Up To Fee Schemes

Posted on by admin

double dipBrokerdealer.com blog update courtesy of Mike Spector and Mark Maremont of the Wall Street Journal.

For years, Private Equity firms have doubled-dipped by receiving management fees from their institutional investors, and at the same time, have pocketed hundreds of millions of separate fees from the companies they have acquired on behalf of those same institutional investors. For the first time, these firms are being pressured by investors, and in some cases, federal regulators to stop the practice of double dipping or face further scrutiny.

The investment firms usually collect the fees from companies they buy for providing services such as consulting, serving as directors and helping them make their own acquisitions. Instead of keeping some of the money, the buyout firms, in new funds they are raising, will now pass the fees on in full to investors in the funds.

The payouts being reimbursed, known in the industry as transaction and monitoring fees, have provided many private-equity firms with a steady income stream augmenting their share of investment gains on deals, which remain the key source of profits from their buyout funds. Private-equity firms buy companies using a combination of cash raised from investors and borrowed money with the aim of improving the companies’ value and selling for a profit a few years down the line.

Buyout firms often receive transaction fees from a company after completing a takeover and for other deal activities, and monitoring fees for consulting and other work while holding the investment.

The turnabout by managers including Blackstone Group LP, KKR & Co. and TPG represents a significant concession in the face of persistent clamor for the private-equity industry to do a better job sharing and disclosing their fees.

The decision by private-equity firms to essentially reimburse investors with payments that can amount to tens of millions of dollars or more, sometimes on just one transaction, shows the increased influence wielded by investors such as public pension funds that historically accepted terms buyout firms proffered.

For Spector and Maremont’s entire Wall Street Journal article, click here.

BrokerDealers Help Mint Billionaires in 2014; Greed Is Good, Funding is Fun

Posted on by admin

startup valuationsBrokerdealer.com blog update courtesy of extracts from 29 Dec edition of the Wall Street Journal, with reporting by Evelyn M. Rusli

As brokerdealers, investment bankers, institutional investors and entrepreneurs “close the books” on 2014, all will agree this has been a remarkable year in which “billion dollar valuations” have seemingly been the norm. Most notably, technological start-ups have enjoyed increasing valuations with each subsequent round of financing from private equity and venture capital firms, albeit many financial industry professionals are wondering whether those valuations can carry over when these private companies embark on initial public offerings (IPOs).

While “Wall Street” protagonist Gordon Gekko coined the phrase “Greed is Good!,” the Broker-Dealers mantra for 2014 was “Funding is Fun!”

Below please find highlights of the WSJ article.

Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi Corp. is now officially the world’s most valuable tech startup, worth $46 billion—the exclamation point on a year of extraordinary valuations. Continue reading →

New IPO makes Brokerdealers Hungrier for 2015

Posted on by admin

timthumbBrokerdealer.com blog update courtesy of Forbes.

Brokerdealers everywhere have rejoiced, Shake Shack, a newer chain restaurant, recently applied for an IPO and set to go public in 2015. Shake Shack is known for its fresh cut fires, 100% all beef burgers and hot dogs, and most of all its delicious shakes. The chain has been growing ever since its opening in New York City in 2000 and now has 63  locations open  worldwide.

Shake Shack, the New York-based burger chain created by famous restaurateur Danny Meyer, is set to go public in 2015, after filing for an IPO Monday.

The chain, which plans to list on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “SHAK,” details a rapid growth effort that has seen an increase from a single shack in Manhattan’s Madison Square Park to 63 locations worldwide today (about half are owned by the company, with the remainder operated by licensees.”

Restaurant concepts have proven a mixed bag in the market, as investors pore over growth prospects looking for chains that could prove as lucrative as Chipotle Mexican Grill CMG -1.73%, which has returned more than 1500% since being spun out of McDonald’s MCD -0.87% in 2006.

IPOs from companies like Noodles & Co, Potbelly and Zoe’s Kitchen were greeted with immense demand, though both stocks have taken their share of hits since debuting. More recently, burger chain Habit Restaurants has surged more than 80% since its mid-November IPO.

At a time when many legacy restaurant operators are struggling to find growth — McDonald’s certainly among them — younger chains with smaller footprints and more runway for expansion are proving attractive.

Shake Shack reported $140 million in system-wide sales for its 2013 fiscal year, up from $81 million the prior year, with 56% of revenue from its domestic, company-owned locations. Total revenue, which only includes licensing revenue from non-owned locations, was $83.8 million in 2013, up 41% from the prior year. Net income declined to $3.5 million, from $4.4 million the year before, due to a sharp increase in expenses, largely attributable to higher food costs and costs associated with opening new locations.

Growth is likely to come both abroad and at home. Aside from New York, with 15 locations, no U.S. state has more than four Shake Shacks.

“Fast-growing restaurant concepts are still hot,” says Paul Bard of IPO research firm Renaissance Capital. “Habit opened up 100% so comparable companies will see that as an opportunity and there’s a whole crop of fast-casual burger chains out there.”

Bard also points to chicken chain Bojangles and Focus Brands, a franchiser of Cinnabon and Carvel, as potential names to watch for on the 2015 IPO market as investors continue to look for growth in the consumer space.

The U.S. economy’s slow recovery and improved consumer spending is certainly a help to restaurants, but Shake Shack’s filing notes that the company’s initial expansion occurred in a far more difficult environment.

“We’ve never believed that Shake Shack only thrives in a down economy, but growing from one to 15 Shacks smack dab in the heart of the recession told us that we also don’t need a robust economy to build our business,” Meyer and CEO Randy Garutti wrote in a letter to prospective shareholders.

Meyer is listed among the shareholders who control at least 5% of Shake Shack’s shares, along with affiliates of private equity firm Leonard Green, Select Equity Group, Alliance Consumer Growth, and Jeff Flug, president of Union Square Hospitality Group, the parent company of Meyer’s other restaurant ventures, and a Shake Shack board member.

The language in the Shake Shack filing also reveals the controlling hand Meyer will maintain at the company post-IPO. He and his affiliates will be entitled to nominate a certain number of directors — five as long as he maintains 50% of his post-offering holdings, and sliding down from there — and must grant approval for a variety of corporate actions, including a sale of the company, firing or hiring of a new CEO or a change in board size, so long as the group keeps 10% of its post-IPO shares.

 

For the original Forbes article, click here.