For broker-dealers, investment bankers, and those following the investment strategies of private equity and venture capital firms, this is one of the better plain-speak summaries profiling the current climate of investing in private companies. The recent outsized valuations during 2014 have caused greybeard investors to scratch their heads…as the outsized pre-IPO valuations are counter-intuitive to traditional investment analysis of private companies, particularly given the assortment of “lower-than-last-private round” post IPO valuations that these same companies are being given in the public marketplace.

For private companies that wish to network with deep-pocketed angel and/or institutional investors, Brokerdealer.com provides an investor forum that connects start-up entrepreneurs with those who can see the forest through the trees.

Below please find excerpts of Liam Denning’s reporting..

Buying a stock, with all its attendant filings, analyst coverage and forecasts, still can be a gamble. So imagine getting excited about one isolated price signal on a private company with all the disclosure of the Air Force’s Area 51.

Yet that is what is setting pulses racing as 2015 dawns. Xiaomi, a closely held Chinese smartphone maker, recently raised $1.1 billion at an implied valuation of more than $46 billion. That puts it ahead of Uber Technologies, the unlisted ride-booking application developer that got new funding in December valuing it at $41 billion. Both numbers also are higher than the market capitalizations of roughly three-quarters of the S&P 500’s members.

In theory, such startup valuations matter little to anyone but a relative handful of founders, employees and venture capitalists. The average investor doesn’t get a seat at the table or more than an occasional glimpse of what even is on the table.

In practice, news of such amazing, and seemingly unobtainable, investments stoke bullish sentiment, leaving individual investors potentially vulnerable.
Venture capitalists and other insiders usually do extensive due diligence before committing to the likes of Uber. But their basis for valuation differs from the approach of mainstream investors buying stocks, with venture funds also considering exit timelines, the cash needs of a startup to keep expanding and maintaining incentives for management and owners as equity stakes get parceled out. They also can, of course, just get things wrong.

Ordinary investors also must consider the wider context. In a world thirsting for yield amid ultralow interest rates, money has sought riskier corners of the market. Almost $24 billion of new commitments flowed to U.S. venture funds in the first nine months of 2014, according to the latest data from Thomson Reuters and the National Venture Capital Association. That is more than in each of the preceding five years in their entirety and sets up 2014 to have been the biggest year for new venture money since before the financial crisis.

This raises the risk of dollars being deployed into questionable businesses, which then eventually find their way into the wider market via initial public offerings, which are priced off the back of those high startup valuations.

For the entire WSJ story, please click here.

The post Private Market Valuations Exceed IPO Valuations: Is This a Bubble?? appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

Wall Street is dealing with new challenges in one of its bedrock businesses, taking young companies public, as more startups choose to stay private longer.

A number of Internet, software and consumer companies are raising huge sums in private deals that enable them to postpone initial public offerings for years, if not indefinitely. Moreover, they often negotiate these private placements directly with investors, bypassing banks.

Initial stock sales are still thriving, despite the big private companies that have held out on an IPO. This past year was the biggest for U.S.-listed IPOs since the dot-com peak in 2000.

But the trend of companies staying private could present longer-term problems for banks. If companies delay or avoid going public, it could threaten the fees and other relationships—with investors, hot young companies and wealthy executives—that banks get from working on IPOs.

Some Wall Street firms are responding by beefing up their teams that work on the private deals, which also gives the firms another chance to build links with startups that may do an IPO later. The private deals could also generate a new stream of fees before the eventual IPO windfall.

“It’s obvious why banks are ramping up for more private offerings,” said David Erickson, a former banker who is now an operating partner at venture-capital firm Bessemer Venture Partners. But because company executives “have already met a lot of public investors by that time, the pitch for bankers is likely more challenging,” he said.

For the full WSJ story, please click here.

The post Startups Bypass BrokerDealers and Investment Bankers appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

As brokerdealers, investment bankers, institutional investors and entrepreneurs “close the books” on 2014, all will agree this has been a remarkable year in which “billion dollar valuations” have seemingly been the norm. Most notably, technological start-ups have enjoyed increasing valuations with each subsequent round of financing from private equity and venture capital firms, albeit many financial industry professionals are wondering whether those valuations can carry over when these private companies embark on initial public offerings (IPOs).

While “Wall Street” protagonist Gordon Gekko coined the phrase “Greed is Good!,” the Broker-Dealers mantra for 2014 was “Funding is Fun!”

Below please find highlights of the WSJ article.

Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi Corp. is now officially the world’s most valuable tech startup, worth $46 billion—the exclamation point on a year of extraordinary valuations.

Valuations placed on tech startups world-wide stretched to record heights in 2014 and accelerated at an exceptional pace, even when compared with the late 1990s dot-com boom.

Xiaomi is just the latest example. On Monday it raised more than $1 billion from investors, giving it the $46 billion overall valuation. Only Facebook Inc. raised capital at a higher value from private investors, at $50 billion in 2011.

This year, venture capitalists, mutual funds and big banks bestowed valuations of $1 billion or more on about 40 startups world-wide, doubling the number of such companies at the start of the year, according to research firm Dow Jones VentureSource.

Adjusted for inflation, the current roster of 70 “billion dollar” startups globally is nearly twice as large as the number during the boom years 1999 and 2000.

A “startup,” in this case, is loosely defined as a young, private company backed by venture capital, with overall valuations derived from the price that pre-IPO investors pay for a fraction of the equity.

Surveying the unprecedented valuations in the private market, “I have trouble drawing a parallel,” said Ted Schlein, a general partner at venture-capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, adding that his firm is trying to exercise “aggressive restraint” as it looks for new investments.

Perhaps more astonishing than the dollar figures was how fast they were achieved. In November, investors paid $1.2 billion for a stake in Uber Technologies Inc. that valued the five-year-old car-hailing service at $41.2 billion, almost 12 times the price set by venture capitalists last year. The valuation of Pure Storage Inc., a vendor of data-storage equipment, tripled to $3 billion in April after less than a year. Slack Technologies Inc. was valued at $1.1 billion in October only a year after releasing its popular work-collaboration product.

In short, 2014 was the year the tech sector went into hyper-drive.

Before this year, only Facebook and Chinese online retailer JD.com Inc. commanded a valuation higher than $10 billion among private companies backed by venture capitalists, according to VentureSource. This year, six startups raised capital at that level or higher.

The prevailing theory behind the investment rush: Technology is overtaking nearly every major industry, from city transportation and hospitality to education and health care. And real businesses are being built, bullish backers say, not the revenue-less startups from those heady dot-com days in the late 1990s, when excitement over the Internet led to a tech-stock bubble that burst in early 2000.

Many of the companies in today’s billion-dollar club, such as Uber, Xiaomi, home-rental site Airbnb Inc., Web storage company Dropbox Inc. and data-mining startup Palantir Inc. are said to be generating tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Airbnb, which is seeking to upend the hotel industry, was tagged with a $10 billion valuation in April, about 40 times its revenue of roughly $250 million in 2013. That revenue had doubled from the previous year, people familiar with the matter previously told The Wall Street Journal. Dropbox, also with a $10 billion valuation, had expected sales of more than $200 million in 2013, up from $116 million the year earlier.

Other companies, like messaging service Snapchat Inc. and online scrapbooking site Pinterest Inc., have barely started making money. Investors are betting those companies can capture audiences that will eventually translate into big money, à la Facebook.

Billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel , an early investor in Facebook, says on balance the field of startups doesn’t feel overvalued. The sum of billion-dollar-plus valuations in the U.S.—at roughly $160 billion—would still be less than half of Google Inc. ’s $365 billion market cap, he says.

Others are less sanguine.

“Without question in some sectors there is a pricing balloon bubble in late stage,” said Peter Fenton, a partner at Benchmark, an early investor in Uber, Dropbox and Snapchat. “At some point, these companies will be held accountable for their financials.”

The pricing party is being partly driven by the endowments, foundations and pension funds that back venture firms like Benchmark. Low interest rates and the prospect of juicy returns—inspired by success stories like Facebook, Google and Apple Inc. —are encouraging these firms to pour money into venture capital.

Venture firms have raised more than $32 billion this year, up 60% from last year’s total, though still well below the $121 billion (inflation adjusted) raised in 2000, according to VentureSource.

The latest figure, however, doesn’t include the dry powder from mutual funds such as BlackRock, T. Rowe Price and Wellington Management, or from hedge funds and big banks, all of which are bidding up prices.

Andrea Auerbach, a managing director at Cambridge Associates who meets with about 700 venture firms a year and advises foundations and other big institutional investors, says venture capitalists increasingly call her to pitch “pre-IPO funds.” The buzz-phrase conjures memories of the dot-com boom, when investors rushed into tech startups ahead of their initial public offerings. It is a sign, according to Ms. Auerbach, that investors are plowing money into startups based on momentum instead of fundamentals.

“There are managers trying to pursue this tactic—and it’s a tactic, not a strategy—of investing in pre-IPO companies,” said Ms. Auerbach. “There’s a clock on this and they’re running out of time.”

At least 30 companies have gone public in the U.S. with lower prices than they were worth in private stock sales or option grants in the prior 90 days, according to Valuation Advisors, which conducts valuations for private companies. Mr. Fenton of Benchmark sits on the board of business software company Hortonworks Inc., whose bankers cut its $1.1 billion valuation in half in December ahead of its IPO to entice investors. The maneuver worked to a degree—its stock rose 65% in the IPO. But the company, which lost $86.7 million on revenue of $33.4 million for the first nine months of the year, is trading slightly below a $1.1 billion market value.

Some warn that the winds will eventually shift in Silicon Valley and the easy money will end, possibly leading to a trail of destruction akin to the dot-com crash, including company failures and investor losses.

Mr. Fenton, whose firm Benchmark has been closely tracking companies’ spending rates this year, sees reckless behavior as the real devil underneath the big valuation numbers.

“Are we creating a generation of companies whose behavior has been poisoned by easy capital?” Mr. Fenton said.

For the entire story from WSJ, please click here.

The post BrokerDealers Help Mint Billionaires in 2014; Greed Is Good, Funding is Fun appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

Bitcoin, the crypto-currency that initially became infamous as the tender of choice for drug traffickers and mercenaries, may be coming to a trading desk or institutional portfolio near you – and sooner than you think.

“2014 is going to be the year Bitcoin hits Wall Street,” said Barry Silbert, founder and CEO of SecondMarket, a capital-raising platform for private companies and investment funds. Indeed, there is a growing consensus in some corners of Wall Street and the buyside community that the $7.8 billion  Bitcoin industry is going to become the new, flashy darling of investors, with dedicated digital currency funds, venture capitalists and asset managers all chasing after those 12 million bitcoins currently in circulation.

“Digital currencies like Bitcoin are not going away,” Silbert explained. “And Wall Street and the regulators know this, they’ve studied how to deal with it, and now they are starting to understand its potential.” SecondMarket has gone heavy into the Bitcoin phenomenon, launching the Bitcoin Investment Trust, a $70 million open-ended trust that invests exclusively in bitcoins, as well as a dedicated desk of 10 traders who buy and sell bitcoins for the trust and other institutional clients. SecondMarket is also creating what it hopes to be the largest, best-capitalized and well-run Bitcoin exchange in the U.S., and is enlisting banks and Bitcoin-related firms to be exchange members.

“The number of inquiries and requests from finance industry professionals for us to prepare compliant investor offering documents for crypto-centric funds is certainly keeping us busy”, said Paul Azous, CEO of Prospectus.com. “We don’t see this as some type of anomaly that is connected to a short-term fad, many of the funds we are working with are forward-thinking folks who realize that blockchain applications will be expressed in nearly every business process.”

In addition to preparing investment fund offering documents, Prospectus.com helps blockchain-based startups craft white papers, presentation decks that resonate with accredited investors and through a captive network of crypto industry consultants, the firm guides those advancing Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs).

Alec Petro, managing partner at Bay Hill Capital Management LLC in Duxbury, Mass., shares Silbert’s passion for Bitcoin. “We’re betting that the market is going to be there, maybe not next month, but soon,” Petro told Traders. “Institutional players are going to want to be in this space.” Petro almost single-handedly plays the role of market-maker in Bitcoin options on the Atlas ATS exchange, the only Bitcoin exchange currently offering options on the digital currency. He also runs a small fund, consisting entirely of Bay Hill Capital partners’ money, that invests in Bitcoin.

Everything Bitcoin needs to break into the mainstream of trading and investing is achievable and starting to happen, according to Petro. “More merchants are taking it and that means more liquidity, more stability in price and, ultimately, more confidence,” he said, checking off the events that will ultimately lead to the Great Bitcoin Revolution that he, Silbert and others are working toward.
The Revolution on Hold
Before the revolution can really begin, of course, Bitcoin has myriad issues to address.

Still, not everyone is convinced. Fitch Ratings threw some cold water on the Bitcoin buzz in an April report, noting that although total Bitcoin consumer transactions averaged $68 million per day in February, a more than tenfold increase compared with the year before, it was still minimal compared with other payment processors and credit card companies. In trading, Bitcoin ranked better, according to Fitch, citing an average daily transaction volume in Bitcoin in February equaling approximately 1 percent of Bitcoin’s total market capitalization. Over the same period, a sample of the largest U.S. equities showed that daily trading volumes were approximately 0.6 percent of total market capitalization, according to Fitch.

Supporters of Bitcoin are unshakable in their faith, however, saying the crypto-currency will play a big part in the future of payment processing, and that future will see an increasing number of trading platforms and investment funds dedicated to Bitcoin.

The Early Adopters
Brett Stapper, co-founder of Falcon Global Capital, a Bitcoin investment fund, is one of those faithful. But he got an early lesson in how hard Bitcoin’s bad past may be to shake. Speaking at a conference in Washington, D.C., about Bitcoin, Stapper thought he’d also reach out to some legislators about issues surrounding Bitcoin. He was stunned at how negative the reaction was to it.

“They had a very bad view of Bitcoin,” Stapper said. “And that worried me because these were the people that were basically in control of the future of Bitcoin in the U.S.” Resolving to rehabilitate the image of Bitcoin in the minds of these doubters, Stapper registered himself as a lobbyist and began to educate people about Bitcoin.

Now, he said, he spends his days on the phone as a Bitcoin evangelist, talking to lawmakers and potential investors. Of course, he’s got skin in the game – Falcon Global Capital runs a $7 million SEC Regulation D Private Investment Fund and is launching a second fund, for offshore investors, later this summer. The funds operate similarly to a gold-holding hedge fund, offering investors exposure by purchasing bitcoins on their behalf, with investments ranging from $25,000 to $10 million, according to the firm’s Website. The bitcoins are then stored in Falcon Global Capital’s digital vault, providing investors easy access and protection from theft.

Fund firms like Falcon Global, SecondMarket and Bay Hill aren’t the only ones to have fallen under Bitcoin’s spell. The Winklevoss brothers, best known for their legal face-off with Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, are awaiting final approval from the SEC for the first-ever ETF that tracks the price of bitcoins. Hedge funds and trading firms such as Fortress Investment Group, Sun Trading, Tradebot Systems, Coin Capital, Pantera Capital Management, Cedar Hill Capital and Havelock Investments have launched Bitcoin funds, or have gotten involved in trading or acquiring bitcoins. Venture capital firms such as Liberty City Ventures and Core Innovation Capital are investing heavily in Bitcoin start-up support companies, like wallet companies (which allow users to hold and store bitcoins) and Bitcoin-focused tech companies that are helping set up exchanges. Tech exec heavyweight Marc Andreessen also is a Bitcoin fan, supporters like to point out.

Still, the number of Bitcoin fan club members who are actually willing to put up their dollars in terms of investment or trading infrastructure development is small, albeit growing. “We are on the front lines of Bitcoin, paving the way for others to get involved,” Stapper said, adding that Falcon Global Capital is anticipating its funds will grow to a combined $100 million in assets by the end of the year.

SecondMarket’s Silbert is also expecting to have a very busy summer. SecondMarket is planning to launch its large U.S. Bitcoin exchange in a few months, and is spinning all of its Bitcoin operations – including the exchange and the Bitcoin Investment Trust – into a yet unnamed separate company.

For the entire story, please visit Traders Magazine via this link

The post BrokerDealers and Buyside: Bitcoin Coming to A Screen Near You appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

Raising venture capital and securing start-up funding is in full swing in this year-round season as 3 more early-stage firms raised $50 million in financing this week courtesy of leading venture-capital firms Sequoia Capital, Greylock Partners, and tech titan Salesforce.com.

Cincinnati-based Lisner Inc., which specializes in audio-beacon technology and embeds tones inaudible to the human ear into digital media, received $3.5mil in funding from Boston-based Progress Ventures, Jump Capital, CincyTech, Serra Ventures and Mercury Fund of Texas. The company expects to have $1mil-$2mil of revenue this year.

Skyhigh Networks scored $40mil to fund growth for its IT service that detects, identifies, scores and controls cloud services..

Yik Yak, best known as a gossip-sharing app that lets users post anonymously to forums raised $10mil

The post Venture-Capital Banking Deals of The Day; Tech Start-Ups Score Funding appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

One of the biggest financial service industry IPOs of the season (as well as any other industry initial public offering of the season) is scheduled to launch on Thursday, and, as noted by the WSJ, Wall Street’s biggest banks are in line for a payday of up to a billion dollars from Markit Ltd.’s share float, as they cash out part of their stakes in the financial-data firm and divvy up the underwriting fees.

The 12 financial institutions that rank among the London company’s top shareholders expect to raise as much as $1.02 billion selling shares Wednesday at as much as $25 apiece, a rare bit of good news at a time of sluggish revenue, soft trading activity and regulatory scrutiny. The largest sellers are expected to be Bank of America Corp. BAC 0.00% , Citigroup Inc. C +0.29% and Deutsche Bank AG DBK.XE +0.49% , with Bank of America selling seven million shares to raise up to $176 million, according to filings.

The firm’s largest holders—an employee-benefits trust, private-equity firm General Atlantic and Singapore state-owned investment company Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd.—aren’t selling their shares, according to regulatory filings. The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board is considering buying $450 million worth of the shares, the filings said.

The offering, which begins trading Thursday, could give the financial-information company a $4.5 billion market value, highlighting Markit’s evolution in the years since the financial crisis and investors’ thirst for data on derivatives, bonds, loans and foreign-exchange markets.

“Markit started with a great idea, which was to create a central pricing service in what were at the time very rapidly growing credit markets,” said Mark Beeston, a former board member and founder of financial-technology venture-capital firm Illuminate Financial Management.

At the same time, the banks that have backed Markit since its founding more than a decade ago have been jockeying for position in selling the offering to the public. The deal is expected to raise as much as $1.1 billion altogether.

The company and the banks are discussing a fee pool of about 4% on the IPO, which would amount to as much as $45 million if the deal is priced at the top of the range, people familiar with the matter said.

The banks skirmished over their roles as the IPO was in its planning stages, according to some of the people familiar with the matter.

For the full story, please click here to visit the WSJ.

The post Markit Heads to IPO Market, Wall Street BrokerDealers All Smiles appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

Companies like Uber and Airbnb have prospered by allowing people to sell their services to strangers on a smartphone-powered network.

Now venture capitalists are betting that a young start-up can use that principle to achieve success in the grocery business.

Instacart, a two-year-old grocery delivery company, announced a $44 million round of financing on Monday led by Andreessen Horowitz. Three venture capital firms that previously invested in the company, Sequoia Capital, Khosla Ventures and Canaan Partners, participated in the latest round.

The company, which is based in San Francisco, lets customers shop online from grocery stores in their area. The orders are filled by other people who have signed up to be shoppers and who receive a cut of the delivery fees. Information about a store’s inventory comes from store managers and from the shoppers. The company says it can have groceries delivered within an hour.

Jeff Jordan, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz, said he was attracted to Instacart because it was a “people marketplace.” He said the company had an advantage over other grocery delivery services, including FreshDirect, because it did not rely on warehouses, trucks or other capital-intensive infrastructure.

“Grocery is the single largest category of retail in the United States and is virtually undigitized at this point,” Mr. Jordan said in an interview. “There is an enormous opportunity if someone can figure it out.”

The founder of Instacart, Apoorva Mehta, previously worked at Amazon in the “fulfillment” division, which oversees the delivery of orders from warehouses to customers. After starting in San Francisco, Instacart has expanded to 10 cities across the country, Mr. Mehta said.

The full article can be found at NYT DealBook.

The post Grocery Delivery Service Instacart Raises $44 Million appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

The British capital is staking a claim as a global leader for financial technology start-ups.

Andrew Testa for The New York TimesTransferWise, which offers foreign exchange transfers without large bank fees, is one of the companies making up London’s growing financial technology start-up scene.

On Monday, TransferWise, one of the city’s most prominent financial technology companies, said it had raised $25 million from a range of investors, including Peter Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal, and the British billionaire Richard Branson.

Started by two Estonian friends in 2011, TransferWise uses peer-to-peer technology that allows individuals around the world to swap currencies without incurring large bank transfer fees.

The company says it has processed roughly 1 billion pounds, or $1.7 billion, of transactions over the last three years, saving its customers around £45 million in banking fees that would have been incurred when sending money to another country.

The London-based start-up, which in 2013 raised $6 million from investors, including from Mr. Thiel’s venture capital firm, Valar Ventures Management, offers foreign exchange transfers across Europe but has yet to break into the United States. (The company offers a limited product for dollar transactions that does not include using peer-to-peer technology to match customers in different countries.) The company’s largest markets are currently Britain, Germany and France.

The full article can be found at NYT DealBook.

The post UK-based Financial Technology Start-Up Scores With London Bankers appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

GoDaddy, the domain name registration giant, plans to sell its shares to investors in an initial public offering.

Courtesy of NYT DealBook

The company, which filed a prospectus with regulators on Monday, is preparing to tap the public markets about two-and-a-half years after it was bought by a group led by the private equity firms Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Silver Lake. GoDaddy previously sought to go public in 2006, but a deal never materialized at that time.

GoDaddy allows individuals and small businesses to set up Internet domain names, offering services like website building, hosting and security. The company had 57 million domains under management as of Dec. 31. It generates the majority of what it calls bookings — gross sales before refunds — from sales of domain names.

K.K.R. and Silver Lake, along with the venture capital firm Technology Crossover Ventures, paid about $2.25 billion for GoDaddy in December 2011. The company plans to use some of the money raised in the I.P.O. to reduce its debt.

It also plans to make a $25 million payment to its private equity and venture capital owners, to terminate an agreement under which the owners have collected fees.

For the full story, please visit NYT DealBook article.

The post GoDaddy to Tap Public Markets for IPO appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.

BrokerDealer.com blog extract is courtesy of New York Times Dealbook

SHANGHAI – James W. Breyer, the venture capitalist who made a fortune with an early bet on Facebook, is putting some of his winnings to work in China, partnering with Beijing-based venture capital firm to invest in Chinese technology start-ups.

IDG Capital Partners said on Wednesday that Mr. Breyer, a longtime partner at Accel Partners in Palo Alto, Calif., would advise and invest alongside a $586 million IDG fund that closed June 3. The fund is expected to make early stage investments in Chinese technology, media and telecommunication companies.

The announcement comes as interest soars in Chinese technology companies after two years of frenzied deal-making, much of it involving China’s Internet giants: Alibaba, Baidu and Tencent. Those three companies alone have spent more than $10 billion buying up start-ups and rivals during the last few years.

And with other technology highfliers here, including JD.com, the Chinese e-commerce company that recently raised $1.78 billion in its New York public listing, China has rapidly become a prime destination for the world’s biggest venture capital and private equity firms. Among the biggest and most active in China are Sequoia Capital, Qiming Ventures, SAIF Partners, IDG Capital Partners and Northern Light Venture Capital.

The post A Chinese Menu of Deals Drives Venture Capital Guru East; BrokerDealer.com spotlight appeared first on BrokerDealer Blog.