<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BrokerDealer Blog &#187; fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brokerdealer.com/blog/tag/fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brokerdealer.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:20:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Fidelity Fined For Overcharging Fees for 7 Years</title>
		<link>http://brokerdealer.com/blog/fidelity-fined-overcharging-fees-7-years/</link>
		<comments>http://brokerdealer.com/blog/fidelity-fined-overcharging-fees-7-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerdealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerdealer blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerdealer.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerdealer.com blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fidelity investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brokerdealer.com/blog/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Brokerdealer.com blog update courtesy of InvestmentNews&#8217;, Mason Broswell. One of the largest mutual funds groups, Fidelity Investments has been ordered to pay a fine after inappropriately charging fee-based accounts that received brokerdealer services for over 7 years. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. has ordered Fidelity Investments to pay a $350,000 fine after the firm allegedly overcharged [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://brokerdealer.com/blog/fidelity-fined-overcharging-fees-7-years/">Fidelity Fined For Overcharging Fees for 7 Years</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://brokerdealer.com/blog">BrokerDealer Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="color: #222222;"><a href="http://brokerdealer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fidelity.jpg"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-930" src="http://brokerdealer.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/fidelity.jpg" alt="fidelity" width="236" height="234" /></a>Brokerdealer.com blog update courtesy of InvestmentNews&#8217;, <a href="http://www.investmentnews.com/article/20150120/FREE/150129994/fidelity-fined-350000-in-billing-snafu?NLID=daily&amp;NL_issueDate=20150120&amp;utm_source=Daily-20150120&amp;utm_medium=in-newsletter&amp;utm_campaign=investmentnews&amp;utm_term=text">Mason Broswell</a>.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">One of the largest <a href="http://brokerdealer.com/databases/investor-database-angel-investors-funding-international">mutual funds groups</a>, Fidelity Investments has been ordered to pay a fine after inappropriately charging fee-based accounts that received <a href="http://brokerdealer.com/member-access-global-database-broker-dealers-qualified-investors">brokerdealer</a> services for over 7 years.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. has ordered <a style="font-weight: bold; color: #b92025;" title="http://topics.investmentnews.com/companies-and-associations/fidelity-investments.htm" href="http://topics.investmentnews.com/companies-and-associations/fidelity-investments.htm">Fidelity </a>Investments to pay a $350,000 fine after the firm allegedly overcharged more than 20,000 clients a total of $2.4 million.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">From January 2006 to September 2013, Fidelity inappropriately charged for certain transactions in fee-based accounts in its Institutional Wealth Services group, which provides trading and brokerage services to investment advisers and their clients, Finra said in a <a style="font-weight: bold; color: #b92025;" href="http://disciplinaryactions.finra.org/viewdocument.aspx?DocNB=38474" target="_blank">letter of settlement</a>.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">Finra said the overcharges resulted from a lapse in supervision over how Fidelity applied fees under its asset-based pricing model, which generally charged on assets rather than by transaction.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">“The firm did not clearly delegate responsibility for the supervision of fee-based brokerage accounts,” Finra said in the letter of settlement. “In fact, until 2013, the firm did not designate a supervisory principal to oversee its [institutional wealth services] asset-based pricing program.”</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">As a result, certain clients may have been double-billed or charged excess commissions in addition to the asset-based management fee, according to Finra&#8217;s letter. For instance, in over 1,000 fixed income transactions initiated by advisers, clients were erroneously charged a markup on the transaction in addition to the asset-based fee, Finra said.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">Fidelity discovered the problems in the spring of 2012, self-reported the issue to Finra and voluntarily reimbursed all clients, according to Adam Banker, a spokesman for Fidelity. The issues affected roughly 1.5% of the brokerage accounts held for investment advisers and the majority required reimbursement of less than $100, according to Mr. Banker.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">&#8220;[Institutional Wealth Services] conducted a thorough internal review of this matter, which resulted in the implementation of enhanced controls and oversight for its asset-based pricing program,&#8221; said Mr. Banker in an emailed statement. &#8220;IWS completed these steps prior to the conclusion of Finra&#8217;s review of this matter.&#8221;</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">The firm agreed to the settlement letter without admitting or denying the findings.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">Fidelity&#8217;s Institutional group is the third-largest custodian when ranked by number of registered investment adviser clients and serves around 3,000 RIAs, according to <i>InvestmentNews&#8217;</i> RIA Custody Database.</p>
<p style="color: #222222;">Fidelity&#8217;s direct-to-consumer, workplace savings accounts and correspondent broker-dealer clearing business, which operates as National Financial, were not affected, Mr. Banker said.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="http://brokerdealer.com/blog/fidelity-fined-overcharging-fees-7-years/">Fidelity Fined For Overcharging Fees for 7 Years</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="http://brokerdealer.com/blog">BrokerDealer Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://brokerdealer.com/blog/fidelity-fined-overcharging-fees-7-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
